The same rig runs both brains. The dataset, retina and click source differ.
Male
- Dataset
- Janelia male CNS v1.0 (HHMI Janelia FlyEM, Cambridge Connectomics Group, Google Research), CC-BY
- Neurons
- 165,122
- Connections
- 10,228,000, at least 3 synapses per pair
- Hex columns per eye
- 892
- Retina
- 892 columns
- Descending neurons used, per side
- DNa02 (1), DNa01 (1), MDN (4), DNp09 (2)
- Click neuron
- MN9, threshold 330 Hz
- Simulation step time
- 0.33 s
- Offline form score
- 2 of 3 fields
- Live form score
- not published
Female
- Dataset
- FlyWire FAFB v783 (FlyWire Consortium, Princeton University, University of Cambridge), CC-BY
- Neurons
- 139,255
- Connections
- 3,641,142 signed, filtered export with at least 5 synapses per pair
- Hex columns per eye
- 785
- Retina
- both eyes on one shared grid, 783 left L1 and 789 right L1 cells
- Descending neurons used, per side
- DNa02 (1), DNa01 (1), MDN (4), DNp09 (2)
- Click neuron
- no MN9 in the export; 24 proboscis motor neurons, threshold 100 Hz
- Simulation step time
- 0.12 s, same code, smaller graph
- Offline form score
- 2 of 3 fields
- Live form score
- 1 of 3 fields, ticker
The descending motor side is identical by name and count in both brains. The fixes that made her walk were two constants and one relabelling, all in the repo, all measurable with compare.py and measure.py.